Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:41:13 01/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2006 at 09:04:39, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 27, 2006 at 09:02:37, Werner Schuele wrote: > >>On January 27, 2006 at 08:58:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>This is a very good question. >>Gute Antwort - und wo ist der Fehler? >> >>WKS > > >81.Kh6?? dadurch erhält S die Möglichkeit zu opfern...nachdem er g4 genommen >hat. I must admit after replaying most of the game, that already 39.Bc6 with the later closing with d5 White opens Black the possibility for that late sacrifice. The B simply is out of play. All such questions are trivial for super GM. Therefore I was quite surprised how Kramnik played in Bahrain. For a super GM it is possible to hurry over some thirty moves if the basic structure doesnt change much. Rybka seems to see that the N has the option to attack Pe4 by Nc8-d6 so that White has not much to do other than wait for the final stroke. Bc6 can only walk to a8 or b7. In other words in such a position with all Black's P on black squares the bN is better than the wB. But again why either Kasparov or Kramnik never played such a trivial game against Fritz? Because that was advertising and not a serious match. If such strategies could be confirmed by more examples I would finally conclude that Rybka really has made some very significant steps towards mastership in chess. However I dont believe in the myst that soon Rybka will have no longer deeper or more important "holes" in its knowledge. The problem is still that chess remains a game of utmost concretness and if you wanted to program all the exceptions your code would look pretty fat.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.