Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:37:46 01/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2006 at 15:30:00, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On January 27, 2006 at 15:26:26, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>Game 15 was a funny draw, due to lack of endgame knowledge Rybka was unable to >>convert a sure win. >> >>I will post the games tomorrow as i plan to do a restart of my comp, before i >>continue with the rest of the games. >> >>Another funny thing is that the two losses were more the result of time trouble >>blunders than lost positions! >> >>"I am in the process of making an opening book for Rybka based on what i have >>observed in Rybka so far in terms of strengths and weaknesses and i am testing >>Rybka beta 12 against Frizt 9 with this book at 90 min + 30 seconds per move >>ponder=off and 256 Mb hash each Fritz uses it's own native book Fritz9.ctg, P4 >>2.8 1 Gb ram and after 16 games (out of a 100) this is the score" >> >> 1234567890123456 >>1 Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 32-bit 1111101½½11110½1 12.5/16 >>2 Fritz 9 0000010½½00001½0 3.5/16 > > Hi Jonas > Oops, this is indeed very impressive. Should the same book > do as well vs other engines, Rybka would need no further > improvements in the next two years -:) > Best regards > Kurt I see the smiley but of course rybka will need improvement even if Rybka1.2 is going to be better than everything else in the next 2 years. comp-comp games is not the only use of chess programs and they are used to analyze positions. I bought only 2 shredder's out of Shredder7.04 and Shredder8 and Shredder9 when shredder was number 1. More improvement could probably convince me to buy all the 3. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.