Author: Graham Banks
Date: 13:22:40 01/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2006 at 16:13:20, Bernardo Wesler wrote: >Kurt: do u say that because of a pragmatic thought or do u have statistical data >based upon the basis of science? >I am asking this to u, first, because u are one of the few seriuos opinions in >CCC, and mainly because it looks like (at least to me) that "hash tables sizes" >is a secret theme or really unknown theme..... >Thx in advance and my kindest regards. >Bernardo. I agree with Kurt. Although opinion seems to be divided on the hash size issue, my belief is that too much hash is detrimental at blitz time controls whereas too little or too much hash can be detrimental at longer time controls. Finding the optimum amount or close to the optimum amount at longer time controls is the key, but after allocating hash to both engines, you should never have used more than half of your ram in total. Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.