Author: Sebastian Leibnitz
Date: 12:07:22 01/28/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2006 at 15:00:25, Roman Hartmann wrote: >On January 28, 2006 at 14:56:48, Sebastian Leibnitz wrote: > >>On January 28, 2006 at 13:44:35, Roman Hartmann wrote: >> >>>On January 28, 2006 at 07:59:03, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>I wonder if there can be some program to detect clones based on the exe files. >>>> >>>>The program does not have to be 100% correct and even detecting part of the >>>>clones is good. >>>> >>>>I remember that there is already a program that help to detect clones based on >>>>source codes and by reverse engineering it should be possible to translate exe >>>>files to source code so I think that the natural step is to have a program that >>>>detects clones automatically for people like Leo by comparing the sources of the >>>>programs that he is using. >>>> >>>>If there is going to be a program that can detect all the clones that were >>>>detected until today and does not have false clone detection by comparing >>>>different free source code programs that are not clones then it is going to be >>>>good. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Hi Uri, >>>I doubt this can be done automatically. >>>Looking fo similar PV's of certain positions (including illegal positions) and >>>compare evals of different positions is probably the simpler approach. AFAIK >>>this is already (sucessfully) done by some people. >>> >>>Roman >> >> >>I disagree. > >Did you note the word 'automatically'? I believe that you are able to identify a >clone by looking at the decompiled code but I doubt that a program can do this >easily. > >Roman Uuups, sorry, I missed the point then. I agree then, its too complex for a program to decide whether its a clone or not. Still, I think decompiling is the way to detect clones, not guessing over PVs and evals... Greetings...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.