Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Statistics... Thanks Ross & Peter for your inputs!

Author: Peter Skinner

Date: 05:30:47 01/29/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 29, 2006 at 06:40:36, chandler yergin wrote:

>http://www.abortionessay.com/eco/a.html
>http://www.abortionessay.com/eco/b.html
>http://www.abortionessay.com/eco/c.html
>http://www.abortionessay.com/eco/d.html
>http://www.abortionessay.com/eco/e.html
>These Links should be handy for Players or Programmers
>
>Yes, I understand what you & Ross are saying Peter, and I'm not disputing it.
>I'm just presenting  my research & asking what your conclusions are.
>Based on millions of games played, there is a correlation between White & Black
>Wins based on ECO Classifications.
>Examples:
>White:     Perf.  55% with the following ECO Classifications
>B12
>C99
>D30
>C99
>B48
>C06
>B90
>E58
>A30
>B50
>B70
>E21
>B22
>C45
>C24
>B04
>C99
>D47
>E02
>B33
>
>Black:  Perf.  45% with the following ECO Classifications
>D24
>B96
>C91
>D46
>D30
>E97
>D31
>E15
>B81
>A09
>A12
>C01
>C34
>D58
>C82
>A22
>B92
>B42
>B61
>E15
>B92
>            I believe your CEGT & SSDF Testing will show the same thing.


My conclusion to your data is this:

White wins 54% of it's games
Black wins 46% of it's games
There are lines for white and black that show there is the possibility of a
pre-formed win, although there are exceptions.

That is my conclusion.

Peter.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.