Author: chandler yergin
Date: 23:12:33 01/29/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 2006 at 15:57:33, Peter Skinner wrote: >On January 29, 2006 at 09:40:50, chandler yergin wrote: > >>Sorry Peter, I have to disagree. >>My Mega 99.cbh Database has 1114444 Games >>54,277 Opening Keys >>56,004 Opening positions >>My Big Database 2003.cbh has 2312073 Games >>55,917 Opening Keys >>56,947 Opening positions >>My eco,pgn has 2014 ECO Opening Classifications with moves.. >> >>I think we can "Classify" any Opening or game played or tested. >>I have presented which ECO Classification is better for White & Black. >>Now using this addition Data & Links I have presented, you can check them out >>yourself. >>I must disagree with your conclusion. > >Again we are talking about apples and oranges. > >I see many instances of "opening" in your data, when the data I am talking about >has _nothing_ to do with the book, opening library, ECO classification, or the >moon and the stars in that world. That world Peter is Chess. What 'data' are you talking about? Statistics of over 2 million games played has been presented. CEGT & SSDF results are an insignificant fraction of those. Could you please clarify what data you mean so we can agree on the terminology, and have a meaningful dialog? Thanks, Chan > >Tell me what opening this position was the result of: > >[D]3R4/1p6/2b5/2P1k2p/p3p2P/P6r/1P2KB2/8 b - - 0 1 > >Just the ECO classification will do.. and only one. I mean it should be easy to >narrow it down to one opening classification based on one position right? > >Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.