Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:49:28 01/30/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2006 at 10:20:59, chandler yergin wrote: >On January 30, 2006 at 06:31:01, Mike S. wrote: > >>On January 30, 2006 at 05:50:04, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On January 30, 2006 at 05:26:12, Mike S. wrote: >>> >>>>Paste the FEN string >>>> >>>>8/8/8/6N1/8/3kn3/4nKn1/8 b - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>into that web page: >>>> >>>>http://chess.jaet.org/cgi-bin/dtx >>>> >>>>Black to move, DTM (distance to mate) = 18 >>> >>>Obviously NOT forced! Keep trying. >> >>If DTM says #18, it IS forced. Keep trying to understand :) > >I don't 'try' I do understand. >> >>Or are you going to "explain" to us that the Nalimovs are wrong? :)) >Analysis by Shredder 8: > >1...Nh4 2.Ne4 Ng4+ 3.Kf1 Ke3 4.Nd2 Nd4 5.Ke1 Kd3 6.Kd1 Ne3+ 7.Kc1 Nhg2 >-+ (-10.66) Depth: 32/66 01:07:20 2431231kN, tb=49150885 >(, 30.01.2006) > >If Shredder can't find at Depth 32/66 it's not there. >It has EGTB's too. This is a 6 piece ending. Do you have the 6 piece files? If so you would know this is a _forced_ mate. Since you don't have them, you don't know a thing other than what Shredder knows, and since it can't search deep enough to see the forced mate, it doesn't have a clue here. For the last time, _stop_ arguing just for the sake of arguing... > >I'm from Missouri, the "Show Me" State. >Saying Mate in 18 & Demonstrating Mate in 18 are 2 different things. > >Whatever Program was used in your Link obviously didn't search deep >enough. Obviously there is NOT a Mate in 18. >> >>Regards, >>M.Scheidl > Try and understand.. ;) ;) ;) >Chan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.