Author: Russell
Date: 10:14:38 01/30/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2006 at 12:10:57, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 30, 2006 at 11:38:17, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On January 30, 2006 at 08:54:07, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>looks very boring in the moment. >>> >>>Where are the other programs/programmers ? >>>when will the counter attack begin ? >> >> Hiarcs 10 is not far below from current Rybka, > >I think it is far below (meaning at least 70 SSDF points) the current Rybka >(Beta 13b). I think the current Hiarcs 10 will be about the level of Fruit 2.2 >on the SSDF list, or 2850 or so. Deep Fritz 9 could only be better (IMHO) by >using several CPUs compared to Rybka, and even then I'd like to see it beat the >64-bit version. > >Still, I have no idea whatsoever as to what to expect of Shredder 10 or the next >version of Fruit, so I won't even project. > > Albert > >>Shredder 10 would logical be a >>little stronger or a little below, while Deep Fritz 9 would probably be about >>equal to current Rybka too..... >> Also i expect Fruit to make a big step. I don't know how much but we will see. >>And of cource i hope Junior would come up with something good! I'm very >>optimistic to it as i always thought Junior has the biggest potential from >>others, to become stronger.... >> The bad thing for the above programs is that Rybka would evolve too....:-) >> >>> >>>do they all reconsider their complete work ? >>> >>>what is going on ? >>> >>>where is stefan meyer kahlen ? >>> >>>it seems nothing can stop rybka. Quad Deep Fritz 9 would definately beat 64-bit Rybka.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.