Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 13:05:39 01/30/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2006 at 15:21:01, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On January 30, 2006 at 14:58:47, Sune Larsson wrote: > >> >> [D]6k1/6p1/p2n4/5P2/2P5/1p6/3r3P/1K2Q3 b - - 0 44 >> >> >> What about 44.-Nxc4? Good or bad? >> >> /S > >It seems to be a fortress but with the 2 white pawns there's possible winning >combinations, look at the following game : > >[d]7k/6p1/p4r2/5P2/4Q3/1K6/7P/8 b - - 0 7 > >[Event "?"] >[Site "?"] >[Date "????.??.??"] >[Round "?"] >[White "Nouvelle partie"] >[Black "?"] >[Result "*"] >[SetUp "1"] >[FEN "6k1/6p1/p2n4/5P2/2P5/1p6/3r3P/1K2Q3 b - - 0 1"] >[PlyCount "38"] > >1... Nxc4 2. Qe6+ Kh8 3. Qc8+ Kh7 4. Qxc4 Rd6 5. Kb2 Rf6 6. Qe4 Kh8 7. Kxb3 Kg8 >8. Kc4 Kh7 9. h4 Kg8 10. Kd4 a5 11. Ke5 Rh6 12. Qg4 Kh7 13. Kf4 a4 14. Kg5 a3 >15. Qa4 Rd6 16. Qxa3 Rc6 17. Qd3 Rf6 18. h5 Kg8 19. Qc4+ Kh7 20. Qe6 * What about keeping the a-pawn on a6 - and if then similar variations like above - on Qc4+ - Kf8 (instead of Kh7). /S
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.