Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 07:07:52 04/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 1999 at 06:20:24, Lin Harper wrote: >On April 08, 1999 at 00:54:15, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On April 02, 1999 at 04:42:35, Tony Hedlund wrote: >> >>>On March 31, 1999 at 10:28:59, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>> >>>>It's a "tie" the same way that FIDE ratings are reported to the nearest 5 >>>>points, but the full accuracy of the rating is used for the actual order in >>>>which the players are listed. >>> >>>My point exactly. Well said Dave. >>> >>>Tony >> >>So what happened to "190"? It's now been removed from the official list, but it >>had (I think) 209 games played, so it should be there. I think it's better to >>have the program showing, even if you can't divulge the name of it for fear of >>legal consequences. >>if the ratings are calculated to the nearest five points,then how come > the top two on SSDF are at 2576, not 2575? >>Dave Gomboc If the ratings that SSDF reports were rounded to the nearest five points, then they _would_ be listed at 2575. SSDF rounds to the nearest integer, that is, one point. Dave Gomboc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.