Author: Tim George
Date: 18:43:31 01/30/06
A have a contructive proposal: if we want to prevent people from coming back under a false name why don't we start banning people for really doing something wrong instead of banning people for idiotic reasons like using slang terms "sucks" ect,. Or for things such as Argueing. Maybe we should start banning people for deliberately attacking other members, instead of banning people for defending themselves after being attacked. If i was going to run for moderator i would run under the platform that almost anything goes but the use of Foul Language... I mean serious like the F word, all slang would be tolerated. Unpopular opinions would also be allowed, for instance if someone wants to critize hiarcs and be alittle curt in doing so this would be allowed, as long as the person did not go overboard to where it is obvious they are trying to defame the program. Also the Rules would be applied to EVERYONE, NO EXCEPTIONS. How about a little tolerance guys? Is all this so bad?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.