Author: ramon b. de robles
Date: 04:39:22 01/31/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2006 at 07:29:14, walt irvin wrote: >i believe rybka would get beat but not for the reason you say here ,,,,if a >super grandmaster (had the program to play and study) for weeks before the match >he should know exactly what he would be facing,,,,,,,figure out its weakness >even if that meant getting the program out of book,,,,,then having the program >play against its self giving one side 10x time per move ect ect ,,,,,just like >if adams had hydra at his house for weeks before the match and could have played >countless games the match would have a diff result,,,,people have this notion >that man will one day be shut out,,,,,,,but man always finds away to win even if >they had to cheat,,,,no mankind will not go away that easy on the chess >board,,,i guess i think that of man because im a prison guard and i get to see >the deviant side day after day ,,, > >walter irvin Maybe its true. So are we not reaching a stage where Computers will beat Human ? But why did Kramnik, Kasparov , Anand found it hard to defeat Deep junior , Deep Fritz and Rebel . And of course with Yusupov against rebel. Bareev against Hiarcs ? And the GMS who played against Chess Tiger during their national championship
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.