Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:56:39 01/31/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2006 at 10:19:23, walt irvin wrote:
>On January 31, 2006 at 08:09:46, M Hurd wrote:
>
>>On January 31, 2006 at 07:45:56, walt irvin wrote:
>>
>>>rybka is strong but,,,,,, i have been testing it and i have seen a few programs
>>>that give it alot of problems,,,,,those programs are fruit 2.21 and chessmaster
>>>default that i just got in there,,,,,,,chessmaster default had a equal result
>>>over 10 games bullet 1 min per game and a equal result over 10 games at 5 min
>>>per game,,,,,maybe at slower time controls ill get a diff result or more games
>>>but it shows that they are not that far away in elo right now,,,,not 100 points
>>>and chessmaster 10 th edition i have had that for awhile so i know thats not a
>>>new program ,,,
>>>
>>>walter
>>
>>CEGT Rating : 40 in 40
>>
>>Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit 2824 based on 3646 games
>>CM10th Default 2678 based on 725 games
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Mike
>
>im sure ur right ,,,,,but i have a question were those games vs each other ????
>maybe vs a wide range they are rated more like that but in a match maybe cm is
>just a bad match for rybka ????????
>
>because rybka does alot better vs fruit than cm which was shut out so i guess im
>just saying that rybka vs cm if u would only view that matchup would not be able
>to tell who was stronger ,,,,,,
You only played 10 bullet/blitz games. Try 50 or 100.
BTW, what were the conditions? Hardware, books, ponder on or off, etc.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.