Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted?

Author: Karlo Bala

Date: 05:30:37 02/02/06

Go up one level in this thread


What do you have in mind after 11...Nfd7?
White is a bit better like in every opening

Regards
Karlo

On February 02, 2006 at 07:35:20, Tony Nichols wrote:
>
>  I use the Sicilian Kan as a main part of my repertoire and have had very good
>results. However, In this game my opponent(and friend) did some special
>preperation. After move 11 it looks like white gets a huge attack. Is this the
>end of the Kan variation?
>
>[Event "LMS 1-08-06"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "2006.01.??"]
>[Round "3"]
>[White "Homa, Seth"]
>[Black "Nichols, Tony"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[ECO "B43"]
>[WhiteElo "2154"]
>[BlackElo "1954"]
>[PlyCount "79"]
>
>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 a6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Bd3 Nf6 7. O-O Bc5 8.
>Nb3 Be7 9. f4 d6 10. a4 b6 11. e5
>
>[D]rnb1k2r/2q1bppp/pp1ppn2/4P3/P4P2/1NNB4/1PP3PP/R1BQ1RK1 b kq - 0 11
>
> This is the critical position. It would appear as though black has done nothing
>wrong and yet white is clearly better. I have analyzed this position with
>various engines and can't seem to find a good defense. Maybe someone want's to
>take a look?!
>
>Regards
>Tony



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.