Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted?

Author: Karlo Bala

Date: 06:01:12 02/02/06

Go up one level in this thread

Yes, it looks pretty for white.
Now, what after 12. exd6 - Bxd6 13. Ne4 - Be7 14. f5! ef5!? ?

Regards
Karlo

On February 02, 2006 at 08:42:32, Tony Nichols wrote:

>On February 02, 2006 at 08:30:37, Karlo Bala wrote:
>
>>What do you have in mind after 11...Nfd7?
>>White is a bit better like in every opening
>>
>>Regards
>>Karlo
>>
>
>
> After 12. exd6 - Bxd6 13. Ne4 - Be7 14. f5!
>
>
>[D]rnb1k2r/2qnbppp/pp2p3/5P2/P3N3/1N1B4/1PP3PP/R1BQ1RK1 b kq - 0 14
>
>
> This looks pretty good for white.
>Regards
>Tony

• Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted? Tony Nichols 06:14:05 02/02/06
  • Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted? Albert Silver 06:42:10 02/02/06
    • Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted? Tony Nichols 07:30:33 02/02/06

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.