Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted?

Author: Tony Nichols

Date: 06:32:58 02/02/06

Go up one level in this thread

On February 02, 2006 at 09:27:02, Kim Roper Jensen wrote:


>Hi Tony
>
>Why not play it something like this
>
>11. e5 dxe5 12. fxe5 Nfd7 then with the plan of Bb7 and Ndc5 and the other
>knight to d7 ??
>
>Im on work so i have no chess progs to check with.
>
>With regards

Hello Kim,

 This is how I played it in the game. The problem is 13. Qg4

[D]rnb1k2r/2qnbppp/pp2p3/4P3/P5Q1/1NNB4/1PP3PP/R1B2RK1 b kq - 0 13

This might just be winning for white. Black's developement is too retarded to
defend.
Regards
Tony

• Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted? Kim Roper Jensen 06:39:01 02/02/06
  • Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted? Tony Nichols 06:58:23 02/02/06
    • Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted? Kim Roper Jensen 07:03:21 02/02/06
      • Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted? Tony Nichols 07:31:50 02/02/06

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.