Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted?

Author: Kim Roper Jensen

Date: 06:39:01 02/02/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 02, 2006 at 09:32:58, Tony Nichols wrote:

>On February 02, 2006 at 09:27:02, Kim Roper Jensen wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Tony
>>
>>Why not play it something like this
>>
>>11. e5 dxe5 12. fxe5 Nfd7 then with the plan of Bb7 and Ndc5 and the other
>>knight to d7 ??
>>
>>Im on work so i have no chess progs to check with.
>>
>>With regards
>
>Hello Kim,
>
> This is how I played it in the game. The problem is 13. Qg4
>
>[D]rnb1k2r/2qnbppp/pp2p3/4P3/P5Q1/1NNB4/1PP3PP/R1B2RK1 b kq - 0 13
>
>This might just be winning for white. Black's developement is too retarded to
>defend.
>Regards
>Tony

I know that this looks ugly but how about g6 ?

If black just gets Bb7 and Nc6 then its not that easy to break through ?

pawn on e5 is also a little loose and black have some contra chances with a
attack also with h7-h5-h4 and so on.

The same as before im on work and cant check with a machine

with regards



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.