Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 06:40:28 02/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2006 at 09:30:40, David Dahlem wrote:
>On February 02, 2006 at 09:07:08, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On February 02, 2006 at 07:06:23, Vikrant Malvankar wrote:
>>
>>>Peter Swidler on Computers
>>>
>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2897
>>[...]
>>Computers play so well these days that, to have a chance to win, you
>>>have to work very hard – and work hard at things that probably will be counter
>>>productive when you play against humans – so it probably will harm your chess a
>>>little.
>>
>> It's a pleasure to hear this. Peter Swidler just confirmed
>> what I have written already many times. In order to not lose
>> vs computers, the GM's must play a style which is either very
>> boring or even contra-productive for their usual chess against
>> humans. Therefore, I fully understand that GM's have no or
>> less interest to play matches vs computer programs.
>> Best regards
>> Kurt
>
>Well, he says he uses computers for analysis. Won't that also be
>counter-productive for playing against humans?
>
>Regards
>Dave
Hi Dave
I don't think so. Analysis - to check own ideas - and
playing games are two different things.
Regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.