Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the Sicilian Kan refuted?

Author: Tony Nichols

Date: 06:58:23 02/02/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 02, 2006 at 09:39:01, Kim Roper Jensen wrote:

>On February 02, 2006 at 09:32:58, Tony Nichols wrote:
>
>>On February 02, 2006 at 09:27:02, Kim Roper Jensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Tony
>>>
>>>Why not play it something like this
>>>
>>>11. e5 dxe5 12. fxe5 Nfd7 then with the plan of Bb7 and Ndc5 and the other
>>>knight to d7 ??
>>>
>>>Im on work so i have no chess progs to check with.
>>>
>>>With regards
>>
>>Hello Kim,
>>
>> This is how I played it in the game. The problem is 13. Qg4
>>
>>[D]rnb1k2r/2qnbppp/pp2p3/4P3/P5Q1/1NNB4/1PP3PP/R1B2RK1 b kq - 0 13
>>
>>This might just be winning for white. Black's developement is too retarded to
>>defend.
>>Regards
>>Tony
>
>I know that this looks ugly but how about g6 ?
>
>If black just gets Bb7 and Nc6 then its not that easy to break through ?
>
>pawn on e5 is also a little loose and black have some contra chances with a
>attack also with h7-h5-h4 and so on.
>
>The same as before im on work and cant check with a machine
>
>with regards


 Yes, This looks interesting but I find it hard to believe that white is not
doing very well. My engines can't decide on how much better white is but they
all think white is better. This needs deep analysis.
Regards
Tony



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.