Author: Kim Roper Jensen
Date: 07:03:21 02/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2006 at 09:58:23, Tony Nichols wrote: >On February 02, 2006 at 09:39:01, Kim Roper Jensen wrote: > >>On February 02, 2006 at 09:32:58, Tony Nichols wrote: >> >>>On February 02, 2006 at 09:27:02, Kim Roper Jensen wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hi Tony >>>> >>>>Why not play it something like this >>>> >>>>11. e5 dxe5 12. fxe5 Nfd7 then with the plan of Bb7 and Ndc5 and the other >>>>knight to d7 ?? >>>> >>>>Im on work so i have no chess progs to check with. >>>> >>>>With regards >>> >>>Hello Kim, >>> >>> This is how I played it in the game. The problem is 13. Qg4 >>> >>>[D]rnb1k2r/2qnbppp/pp2p3/4P3/P5Q1/1NNB4/1PP3PP/R1B2RK1 b kq - 0 13 >>> >>>This might just be winning for white. Black's developement is too retarded to >>>defend. >>>Regards >>>Tony >> >>I know that this looks ugly but how about g6 ? >> >>If black just gets Bb7 and Nc6 then its not that easy to break through ? >> >>pawn on e5 is also a little loose and black have some contra chances with a >>attack also with h7-h5-h4 and so on. >> >>The same as before im on work and cant check with a machine >> >>with regards > > > Yes, This looks interesting but I find it hard to believe that white is not >doing very well. My engines can't decide on how much better white is but they >all think white is better. This needs deep analysis. >Regards >Tony although white have an attractive position im not sure if he got the better game, especially because the black position is very hard to break through. white have better piece play but a isolated pawn at e5, where as black have a very solid position with no obvious targets. This is interesting and i will look closer tonight. with reagrds Kim PS if you are on ICC we can look at it tonight ??
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.