Author: J. Wesley Cleveland
Date: 10:20:18 02/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2006 at 23:21:14, Yakov Konoval wrote: >On February 01, 2006 at 20:52:47, Greg Simpson wrote: > >>The access code is certainly subject to copyright, since there are many ways to >>express the ideas. It is not so clear for the data files. Perhaps the encoding >>method could make them subject to copyright, or it might be patented. I think >>the uncompressed files would not be copyrightable, the same way raw address >>lists aren't. I'm still not a lawyer. > >IMO, it's absolutely clear for the data files, even uncompressed. >Using them without author's permission is illegal. > >And I'm not a lawyer too :-) > >YK If I write my own code and generate my own EGTBs, but I use the same methods to reduce redundency, would I have the right to sell them even if the uncompressed files are byte for byte identical ? Also not a lawyer.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.