Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 22:32:28 02/02/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2006 at 23:59:22, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Nf3 d6 5. Bf4 O-O >6. e3 Nbd7 7. Be2 Qe8 8. h3 e5 9. Bh2 Qe7 10. O-O c6 11. >c5 dxc5 12. dxe5 Ne8 13)e6 (= at depth = 19) > > >Rybka believes it is fully compensated for the lost pawn. i presume (perhaps >incorrectly) that it is because of black's doubled pawns and white's greater >activity and space > > > >I think it would be really nice for an analysis tool to give you greater >information about why it is evalauting a position a certain way. e.g., why is >this position evaluated as equal? What sort of output would an engine have to >generate to give you this information? ChessMaster has a "Human Readable" analysis why a position is supposed to be good or bad.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.