Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:33:56 02/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2006 at 11:23:41, James Constance wrote: >Actually this describes correspondence chess, where use of computers is not >prohibited, such as with ICCF and IECG (I think). There is the potential for >the games to have a very high standard, although I believe sometimes people rely >too heavily on their computer understanding the position, and the games have >little creativity. However at higher levels (say around ELO 2300+) I don't think >it's possible to take a computer evaluation for granted. I think that the main mistakes that people do in correspondence games is that they rely too heavily on their human understanding and not relying too heavily on their computer understanding. computer with no help can probably get easily more than 2400. at higher levels(2700+) is it not possible to take a computer evaluation for granted but 2300 is IMO not a high level. My games has little creativity(Usually I only choose which program to believe) and it did not prevent me to get an ICCF rating of almost 2600. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.