Author: Joseph Ciarrochi
Date: 21:43:53 02/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
Interesting. The error estimates seem to be larger for bayeselo. Was it using a different confidence interval (e.g., +-99%)? On February 04, 2006 at 00:12:17, Kirill Kryukov wrote: >On February 03, 2006 at 22:53:56, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>bayeselo generates numbers that are quite different, in scale, from those >>generated by elostat (e.g, cegt ratings). Is their anyway to make the scale the >>same? > >Bayeselo has "scale" command, which is doing just that. That is, if you really >mean the scale difference. If you want to shift the whole rating list up or >down, it is done with "offset" command in Bayeselo. > >>Also, has anybody done a comparison of the two rating systems (bayelo versus >>elostat). Are their big differences? > >I was using both programs for CEGT and other tourneys for some while now, and >Bayeselo gives more consistent and stable ratings, in my feeling. Bayeselo >homepage has also some explanation about how it compares with ELOstat. Bayeselo >is particularly good with strange or extreme cases, and big rating differences. > >The last CEGT list that I constructed (obsolete by now) contains ratings by both >Bayeselo and ELOstat: >http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/cegt/rating-table-all-hidden.shtml > >Best, >Kirill
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.