Author: Tony Thomas Karippa
Date: 23:29:06 02/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2006 at 19:33:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 03, 2006 at 11:23:41, James Constance wrote: > >>Actually this describes correspondence chess, where use of computers is not >>prohibited, such as with ICCF and IECG (I think). There is the potential for >>the games to have a very high standard, although I believe sometimes people rely >>too heavily on their computer understanding the position, and the games have >>little creativity. However at higher levels (say around ELO 2300+) I don't think >>it's possible to take a computer evaluation for granted. > >I think that the main mistakes that people do in correspondence games is that >they rely too heavily on their human understanding and not relying too heavily >on their computer understanding. > >computer with no help can probably get easily more than 2400. > >at higher levels(2700+) is it not possible to take a computer evaluation for >granted but 2300 is IMO not a high level. > >My games has little creativity(Usually I only choose which program to believe) >and it did not prevent me to get an ICCF rating of almost 2600. What did you gain out of it Uri??
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.