Author: Pedro Gomes
Date: 15:29:28 02/04/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2006 at 16:27:30, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 04, 2006 at 16:11:10, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 04, 2006 at 13:57:16, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >> >>>Since Shay Bushinsky and Amir Ban have given the world the excellent Junior >>>chess programs I am very interested in their goals to remain on top. I really >>>doubt that Vasik Rajlich is smarter than Shay or Amir. Perhaps Rybka was the >>>result of serendipitous imagination as seen in inventors/scientists like >>>Edison,Tesla and Kekulé. >>> >>>TJ >> >>One important difference. >> >>As far as I know Vasik plans to fix all cases when rybka does stupid tactical >>errors that other programs avoid and he shares his plans for future rybka. >> >>It is not clear if Amir plans to fix stupid tactical errors of Junior and he >>tells nothing about his plans of fixing cases that Junior does them. >> >>For example Junior for years has problems with stalemate detection and Junior >>can miss some stalemate combination and Amir tells nothing about the question if >>he has plans to fix it sometimes in the future. >> >>Vasik give details about knowledge that he is going to add to rybka. >>Amir tells nothing about knowledge that he adds to Junior and the only way that >>customaers can know about it is simply to buy the program and compare with >>previous version. >> >>Uri > > > Amir will go into politics very soon. See CTF! I´d say: following Kasparov´s example.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.