Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: incredible nonsense

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 13:08:19 02/05/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 05, 2006 at 15:44:36, chandler yergin wrote:

>What do you think you are testing?
>Engines?
>No!

???

>You are Testing the current Theory of Chess.
>The Openings! There is a Direct correllation.
>Games have 3 outcomes. Win Loss Draw.


???

>You cannot refute over 2 million games played.
>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?484643

???

What has your irrelevant as usual posting to do
with different engines strength?
What has it to do with chess games at all? Your permanently mantra
about the _average_ chess outcome for a game is as useful
as stating there are 32 pieces and 64 squares.

Chandler it's darker in the night and brighter at day
and what?.

I cannot believe that you still post all that nonsense...

The only worlds where your statement makes some sense are
1) asylums
2) worlds where all chess entities are of the same strength




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.