Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: On a side note

Author: Bernd Nürnberger

Date: 22:55:48 02/05/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 04, 2006 at 07:40:23, David B Weller wrote:

>Hi Bernd,
>
>Every once and a while, I like to see my engine scream out some ply in search,
>so I replace eval with a material only eval.
>
>It goes fast for the opening but soon gets so completely lost, it doesnt do any
>better than with full eval [speed wise, I mean]
>
>Your 'vanilla' eval, is really even less than 'vanilla' really, and it will
>seriously effect everything you do
>
>Just a 'tid-bit' you may find useful.
>
>-David
>
>BTW - the trend seems to be more and more toward knowledge ...

Hello David,

until now, I was not conerned much about eval, because I'm a very weak chess
player. Probably everything looks completely different, if I add some more eval
terms as king safety, pawn structures and so on. But nethertheless I wondered
whether such a low beta cut rate seams reasonable.

I now suspect that due to my simple eval, many nodes have the nearly the same
eval score, and thus a beta cut is not applied very often. Moving a queen, king
or rook without capturing does not change the score at all... :(

Will work on a at least reasonable eval now before tuning the search module any
further because I think it makes more sense this way...

Thanks for your thoughts...

Bernd



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.