Author: chandler yergin
Date: 04:22:39 02/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2006 at 16:08:19, Günther Simon wrote: >On February 05, 2006 at 15:44:36, chandler yergin wrote: > >>What do you think you are testing? >>Engines? >>No! > >??? > >>You are Testing the current Theory of Chess. >>The Openings! There is a Direct correllation. >>Games have 3 outcomes. Win Loss Draw. > > >??? > >>You cannot refute over 2 million games played. >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?484643 > >??? > >What has your irrelevant as usual posting to do >with different engines strength? Only if you 'tweak' them do they have different relative strengths against each other in play. >What has it to do with chess games at all? It has everything to do with it! Your permanently mantra >about the _average_ chess outcome for a game is as useful >as stating there are 32 pieces and 64 squares. It's NOT Average Chess Outcome! It's Factual Data based on over 2 million games played! CEGT & SSDF Confirm the same thing. > >Chandler it's darker in the night and brighter at day >and what?. > >I cannot believe that you still post all that nonsense... I can't believe you have such a hard time grasping the obvious. > >The only worlds where your statement makes some sense are >1) asylums >2) worlds where all chess entities are of the same strength You haven't done any research have you? Of course not, or you would not make absurd statements like this.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.