Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:59:16 02/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2006 at 12:00:54, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On February 06, 2006 at 09:11:00, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>On February 05, 2006 at 06:10:55, Vasik Rajlich wrote:
>>
>>>On February 04, 2006 at 12:19:33, dhanial wrote:
>>>
>>>>What is the best hash table settings for rybka for 10 to 15 min games and for 1
>>>>to 3 min games.
>>>
>>>For all time controls, as high as possible, provided that there is no swapping
>>>to disk.
>>>
>>>Vas
>> You are Posting nonsense.
>>No Credible Programmer or Player would agree with this!
>>http://www.rebel.nl/ches2010.htm
>
>
>You are posting nonsense. I certainly agree with him. I've said so _many_
>times.
The link he posted has the following quote (for the 'Chess in 2010 experiment'):
"Programs will use the maximum hash table setting possible"
Let's see...
Robert Hyatt {credible chess programmer}
Ed Schroder {credible chess programmer}
Vasik Rajlich {credible chess programmer}
all seem to agree that big hash is a good thing, especially at slow time
control. In fact, I would like to hear of any credible programmer that thinks
having a large hash table is a detriment.
The quote "No Credible Programmer or Player would agree with this!"
has [therefore] been refuted (to nobody's surprise).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.