Author: chandler yergin
Date: 11:48:24 02/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2006 at 11:59:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 06, 2006 at 09:07:40, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On February 06, 2006 at 07:47:51, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>On February 06, 2006 at 07:22:39, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>On February 05, 2006 at 16:08:19, Günther Simon wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 05, 2006 at 15:44:36, chandler yergin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>What do you think you are testing? >>>>>>Engines? >>>>>>No! >>>>> >>>>>??? >>>>> >>>>>>You are Testing the current Theory of Chess. >>>>>>The Openings! There is a Direct correllation. >>>>>>Games have 3 outcomes. Win Loss Draw. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>??? >>>>> >>>>>>You cannot refute over 2 million games played. >>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?484643 >>>>> >>>>>??? >>>>> >>>>>What has your irrelevant as usual posting to do >>>>>with different engines strength? >>>>Only if you 'tweak' them do they have different relative strengths against each >>>>other in play. >>> >>>Now you really uttered what I always could not believe, but suspected >>>from your strange posts: >>>YOU think all different engines are in reality of the same strength >>>and it is just the users fault, if they are not(by changing options)?? >>> >>>Come on, that's what I call absurdity... >>>speechless... >>> >>> >>>>>What has it to do with chess games at all? >>>>It has everything to do with it! >>>> >>>> Your permanently mantra >>>>>about the _average_ chess outcome for a game is as useful >>>>>as stating there are 32 pieces and 64 squares. >>>> >>>>It's NOT Average Chess Outcome! >>>>It's Factual Data based on over 2 million games played! >>>>CEGT & SSDF Confirm the same thing. >>>>> >>>>>Chandler it's darker in the night and brighter at day >>>>>and what?. >>>>> >>>>>I cannot believe that you still post all that nonsense... >>>>I can't believe you have such a hard time grasping the obvious. >>> >>> >>>You are hopeless. >>Refute what I Post or SHUTUP! > > >Either get off whatever medication you are on, or stop posting such nonsense. I'd be pleased to do so if anyone refutes my post as nonsense. Have any done so? >We've told you previously that if moderator email complaints rise again, serious >consequences will follow. What do complaints have to do with truth? You let posters attack me at will with no consequence; you attack me and threaten me at will also. Why should a victim of attack & complaints by those who are not technically competant be persecuted? cy > > > > > >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>>The only worlds where your statement makes some sense are >>>>>1) asylums >>>>>2) worlds where all chess entities are of the same strength >>>> >>>>You haven't done any research have you? >>>>Of course not, or you would not make absurd statements like this.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.