Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 12:33:29 02/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2006 at 14:29:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 06, 2006 at 14:19:54, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >> >>> >>>I see it is your intention to go down the _same_ road you have gone down many >>>times previously... that is, arguing about a point that you have zero >>>understanding of. >>> >> >> >>If he would seek politely to know, we could teach him. >>My engine is so designed that "The larger the better" is always true concerning >>hash size (independent of time control). >> >>Matthias. > > >I suspect you meant to add a qualifier, since beyond a certain size, larger hash >has no effect. Once you can store everything you want to store, making it >bigger does nothing good or bad. Until you reach that point, bigger is always >better, I agree. Yes, there's a point above which more hash would not even be used.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.