Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:03:45 02/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2006 at 16:01:12, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On February 06, 2006 at 15:52:02, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On February 06, 2006 at 15:26:31, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>You don't need Diagrams; just read the text and it's obvious.. >> >> >>You are utterly beyond hope. This "crap" you post has _nothing_ to do with >>deciding whether big hash is better or worse than small hash. It's the old >>"monkeys in a room full of typewriters" type thing. Your words are valid, but >>they mean absolutely nothing when taken in context. >> > >What is his point.....? I really can't understand what he is trying to >say....?!?! > I mean to write all this huge posts and play all these games there is a kind of >intelligence behind that. So what he means with all that....? It works like this: Hypothesis: "Elephant guns should not be used for elephants." 1. I found a 22 and shot an earthworm with it. Q.E.D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.