Author: John Merlino
Date: 13:33:13 02/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2006 at 16:03:45, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 06, 2006 at 16:01:12, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On February 06, 2006 at 15:52:02, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On February 06, 2006 at 15:26:31, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>You don't need Diagrams; just read the text and it's obvious.. >>> >>> >>>You are utterly beyond hope. This "crap" you post has _nothing_ to do with >>>deciding whether big hash is better or worse than small hash. It's the old >>>"monkeys in a room full of typewriters" type thing. Your words are valid, but >>>they mean absolutely nothing when taken in context. >>> >> >>What is his point.....? I really can't understand what he is trying to >>say....?!?! >> I mean to write all this huge posts and play all these games there is a kind of >>intelligence behind that. So what he means with all that....? > >It works like this: > >Hypothesis: >"Elephant guns should not be used for elephants." > >1. I found a 22 and shot an earthworm with it. >Q.E.D. Damn funny! :-D jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.