Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 'large hash' vs 'small hash' I rest my case again ..(sigh)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 13:59:40 02/06/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 06, 2006 at 16:33:13, John Merlino wrote:

>On February 06, 2006 at 16:03:45, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On February 06, 2006 at 16:01:12, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>>
>>>On February 06, 2006 at 15:52:02, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 06, 2006 at 15:26:31, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>You don't need Diagrams; just read the text and it's obvious..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You are utterly beyond hope.  This "crap" you post has _nothing_ to do with
>>>>deciding whether big hash is better or worse than small hash.  It's the old
>>>>"monkeys in a room full of typewriters" type thing.  Your words are valid, but
>>>>they mean absolutely nothing when taken in context.
>>>>
>>>
>>>What is his point.....? I really can't understand what he is trying to
>>>say....?!?!
>>> I mean to write all this huge posts and play all these games there is a kind of
>>>intelligence behind that. So what he means with all that....?
>>
>>It works like this:
>>
>>Hypothesis:
>>"Elephant guns should not be used for elephants."
>>
>>1.  I found a 22 and shot an earthworm with it.
>>Q.E.D.
>
>Damn funny! :-D
>
>jm


would be one hell of a lot funnier if it wasn't true, also...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.