Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 'large hash' vs 'small hash' I rest my case again ..(sigh)

Author: John Merlino

Date: 14:09:37 02/06/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 06, 2006 at 16:59:40, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On February 06, 2006 at 16:33:13, John Merlino wrote:
>
>>On February 06, 2006 at 16:03:45, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On February 06, 2006 at 16:01:12, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 06, 2006 at 15:52:02, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On February 06, 2006 at 15:26:31, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You don't need Diagrams; just read the text and it's obvious..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are utterly beyond hope.  This "crap" you post has _nothing_ to do with
>>>>>deciding whether big hash is better or worse than small hash.  It's the old
>>>>>"monkeys in a room full of typewriters" type thing.  Your words are valid, but
>>>>>they mean absolutely nothing when taken in context.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What is his point.....? I really can't understand what he is trying to
>>>>say....?!?!
>>>> I mean to write all this huge posts and play all these games there is a kind of
>>>>intelligence behind that. So what he means with all that....?
>>>
>>>It works like this:
>>>
>>>Hypothesis:
>>>"Elephant guns should not be used for elephants."
>>>
>>>1.  I found a 22 and shot an earthworm with it.
>>>Q.E.D.
>>
>>Damn funny! :-D
>>
>>jm
>
>would be one hell of a lot funnier if it wasn't true, also...

Actually, I think it was funnier BECAUSE it was true. :-)

jm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.