Author: Engin Üstün
Date: 17:15:49 02/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2006 at 20:03:44, Engin Üstün wrote: >On February 06, 2006 at 17:20:00, Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso wrote: > >>Some time ago I saw someone reporting (don't remember if it was here) Rybka >>doing 30Knps, while crafy 19.x doing 800Knps and Fritz8 doing over a million nps >>on his pc while beating both crafty and fritz. >> >>Over the years computer programmers said that nps was an importante factor in an >>engine performance, (and I agree, look at Deep Blue and Hydra). >>In face of Rybka nps, my question is: >>What the hell is going on? >>In this department Rybka seams to prove that nps isn't a factor for performance >>at all. >> >>Please state you opinion on this. >> >>best regards, >>Alvaro Cardoso > >i sad allways that speed is nothing in computerchess, importent is a bugfree and >with much full chess knowledge engine. > >most people thinking "more speed, high strength", we know now thats not true. > >also with multiprozessor engines are not more stronger then 1 cpu engine. > >last WCCC wins Zappa with multi cpu, but Fruit was the 1 cpu performance best >engine. > >if Rypka plays next WCCC , of course that wins this tourney... > >good night, >Engin P.S. i believe also that Rypka on same hardware speed beats Hydra, Zappa, Shredder, Fritz, Zappa and other multi-culti cpu engines 100:0 ;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.