Author: Kirill Kryukov
Date: 18:58:35 02/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2006 at 09:11:14, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 05, 2006 at 14:03:49, Ray Banks wrote: > >Great list, and above all great stats. Very interesting, and no doubt of use to >many. Of particular interest, and agreeing with expectations, were the >similarity in evalluations between Fruit 2.2 and Toga 1.1, as well as the rather > large difference (disagreement) between Rybka and Shredder 9. Since Rybka had >originally been tuned to beat Shredder 9, it is no surprise to see its >difference of opinion is particularly large against it. > >Great work! > > Albert Thanks! We will continue our work to study and understand the performance and features of chess engines, and we are planning to add many more interesting statistics and analysis reports. Please stay tuned! Yes, the "eval diff" table shows very well how far the Toga diverged from Fruit - their difference is much smaller than Ktulu 7.1 - 7.5, or Deep Fritz 8 - Fritz 9, etc.. Best, Kirill
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.