Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Collecting proposals for themes CEGT 40/120

Author: Heinz van Kempen

Date: 22:17:05 02/06/06


Hi all,

after more thoughts I find the idea to run the CEGT Championships 40/120 as
theme tournaments (like proposed by Joseph and Dann) in order to see if engines
will "write" new chess theory for example quite fascinating.

Dann proposed 1.b4, a rather uncommon but not bad line also called Orang Utan,
Sokolsky or Polish opening, so the first double round robin could be with this
one.

Here is something about the history taken from this site:

http://www.angelfire.com/home/bstjean/sokolsky/

The origin of this spectacular opening is more or less well known.  Tartakower
played it at the beginning of this century and supposedly had the idea of the
"b" climbing pawn after observing apes at the zoo.  But Tartakower never took
this opening seriously.  Bugayev, a Russian master, also played it in matches
and in a simultaneous game against Steinitz.  Also, Englisch and Schlechter
played the Orangutan in games before Tartakower even dreamed of it!  All these
players had opened a door that was to be entered by a young Russian master...
It is only after many excellent (but sadly many lost) analysis by Sokolsky and
many of his correspondence trials (and even OTB games!) that this opening really
got serious treatment. Sokolsky (and later Katalimov) produced the first serious
study of this fantastic debut and even played it!

Nowadays, top players at the international level (OTB) almost never play it
(except for Ljubojevic and Larsen in their early days) and the Orang Utan is
usually used for its element of surprise.  The only known exception that I know
is Gilles Mirallès (France champion) who played it for most of its career.
Besides these few trials in OTB games, the Orang Utan opening is mostly used in
correspondence chess.

There is also a magazine and books dealing with this:

http://www.angelfire.com/home/bstjean/sokolsky/pages/magazine.html

So my question to Dann would be: Do you have a special interesting subvariation
(line) in mind?

Joseph mentions the Kan variation. Any concrete line here? Please restrict it
then to a maximum of 12 moves (24 plies) we will give before the engines start
to calculate.

Proposals for variatios are highly welcome.

Best Regards
Heinz

http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/





This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.