Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Not 'wrong': just arguably 'best defence' by Black

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 09:55:29 02/09/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 09, 2006 at 12:22:00, GuyHaworth wrote:

>
>In a study, Black is required to play what can be justified as 'its best
>defence'.
>
>The presumed scenario is that White is a fallible player, not an infallible
>player with an Endgame Table.
>
>It is therefore assumed that White might unthinkingly Queen the Pawn, in which
>case, Black has swindled a draw.  This is seen as Black's best chance of
>snatching the draw.  The biggest threat to White is the Queen that is not even
>on the board.
>
>This was, as it happens, discussed in the ICGA Journal (2000) v23 No. 2 pp.
>94-96.
>
>g

I am not sure what is the best practical chance of black in human-human game.

There is a positive probability that white is going to blunder by promoting to
queen but there is also a practical chance that white is going to blunder by not
being able to win KQ vs KR endgame.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.