Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:05:48 02/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2006 at 04:26:01, Uri Blass wrote:
>On February 11, 2006 at 04:13:45, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On February 10, 2006 at 15:55:55, Russell wrote:
>>
>>>I dont agree with the list. H10 Hypermodern is not stronger than Fritz 9 nor is
>>>S9 sronger than Fritz 9.
>>
>>Our current testing at 4040 I would say I am sure Fritz 9 is not weaker than
>>Shredder 9. Hiarcs 10 hypermodern we are still continuing to test. I do though
>>think Fritz 9 is much stronger than the list seems to indicate but as with all
>>rating list that is also why there are + and - error bars.
>>
>>http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/rating-table-all.shtml
>>
>>Sarah
>
>Your results are based on different conditions(as far as I know you do not use
>original book or pondering).
>It is possible that Fritz9 is better in your conditions and shredder9 is better
>in ssdf conditions.
>
>Uri
Yes, the SSDF is the only list to use the actual opening books provided with the
programs, so it may very well be that the book provided with Fritz 9 is simply
inefficient compared to the books made for the other top programs.
Albert
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.