Author: Chessfun
Date: 10:24:25 02/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2006 at 09:05:48, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 11, 2006 at 04:26:01, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 11, 2006 at 04:13:45, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On February 10, 2006 at 15:55:55, Russell wrote: >>> >>>>I dont agree with the list. H10 Hypermodern is not stronger than Fritz 9 nor is >>>>S9 sronger than Fritz 9. >>> >>>Our current testing at 4040 I would say I am sure Fritz 9 is not weaker than >>>Shredder 9. Hiarcs 10 hypermodern we are still continuing to test. I do though >>>think Fritz 9 is much stronger than the list seems to indicate but as with all >>>rating list that is also why there are + and - error bars. >>> >>>http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/rating-table-all.shtml >>> >>>Sarah >> >>Your results are based on different conditions(as far as I know you do not use >>original book or pondering). >>It is possible that Fritz9 is better in your conditions and shredder9 is better >>in ssdf conditions. >> >>Uri > >Yes, the SSDF is the only list to use the actual opening books provided with the >programs, so it may very well be that the book provided with Fritz 9 is simply >inefficient compared to the books made for the other top programs. > > Albert Actually my own rating list is also with original books: http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999/rating.html Sarah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.