Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:47:03 02/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2006 at 14:40:50, Albert Silver wrote: > >>Let make some comparison: >>Your list: >> >>1 Fruit 2.2.1 2843 22 22 610 65.8 % 2729 38.9 % >>3 Fritz 9 2830 30 29 340 62.2 % 2744 37.9 % >>5 Shredder 9 2812 29 28 360 63.1 % 2719 38.3 % >> >>CEGT list: >> >>8 Fruit 2.2-2.2.1 2783 8 8 5211 65.7 % 2669 33.2 % >>9 Fritz 9 2780 11 11 2951 62.0 % 2695 30.4 % >>14 Shredder 9 2753 8 8 4805 63.2 % 2659 31.9 % >> >>The difference in your list between fritz and shredder is smaller so it is >>possible that book help more shredder than Fritz. > >Actually, I think the error margin is a big factor here also. > > Albert I agree but there is no reason to assume that error margin explain the difference. It is possible that without error margin results could be even better for shredder in sarah's list. My point is that the conclusion that if we play more games Fritz is going to earn rating in the ssdf list has no basis and it is also possible that more games are going to increase Shredder9's advantage relative to fritz9. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.