Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:35:27 02/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 00:56:23, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 12, 2006 at 00:52:26, Sarah Reynolds wrote: > >>Yes I noticed he hasn't responded to this thread, instead further down he takes >>a shot at me calling my post about Hiarcs Strength "useless". I invite Mr >>SKinner to cite another example of the useless threads on this board since he >>claimed that most of them are, I want him to to cite an addition example of the >>useless post here, lets see him insult another member. I think he specifically >>chose me because I am new. So I guess he felt he could get away with an attack. >>I wonder why I got so many responses if my thread was as "useless" as he claims, >>obviously somebody thought it was a worthwhile post? I agree his behavior is >>very unbecoming for a moderator. > >You are hardly "new" Sarah, and you know it. I wonder how do you know it. > >Which would you rather be called? Sherry Windsor? Sarah Reynolds? Based on my memory sherry and sarah expressed opposite opinions. I remember that Sherry posted things like "Hiarcs sucks" and this is the reason or one of the reasons that Sherry was banned when Sarah Reynolds said positive things about hiarcs in the post that you gave a link to it. Of course it does not prove nothing because the same poster may post different opinions in different names but I think that claiming that 2 posters are the same should not be done with no evidence. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.