Author: Chessfun
Date: 23:11:00 02/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 01:51:37, Sarah Reynolds wrote: >On February 12, 2006 at 00:56:23, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On February 12, 2006 at 00:52:26, Sarah Reynolds wrote: >> >>>Yes I noticed he hasn't responded to this thread, instead further down he takes >>>a shot at me calling my post about Hiarcs Strength "useless". I invite Mr >>>SKinner to cite another example of the useless threads on this board since he >>>claimed that most of them are, I want him to to cite an addition example of the >>>useless post here, lets see him insult another member. I think he specifically >>>chose me because I am new. So I guess he felt he could get away with an attack. >>>I wonder why I got so many responses if my thread was as "useless" as he claims, >>>obviously somebody thought it was a worthwhile post? I agree his behavior is >>>very unbecoming for a moderator. >> >>You are hardly "new" Sarah, and you know it. >> >>Which would you rather be called? Sherry Windsor? Sarah Reynolds? >> >>If your post isn't useless, please explain how it is. >> >>You make a blanket statement, provide no proof for your statement.. typical.. >> >>Peter > > Now you are getting even more rediculous then I thought possible even for you. >The title of my post who "How strong is Hiarcs" this is a question not a >statement. Why should I not proof for a Question? Then in the content of the >post I said it "seems to me that rykba is very strong and is stronger then >rykba" this is a subjective feeling, You made the statement with the content of the post. Peter made no mention of the header. "This program to me seems stronger then Rykba, it plays a mean game of chess and doesn't give the human player any chances at all, great program i think." >the current SSDF list certainly gives some >validaty to that feeling. What don't need Scientific evidence for every thing we >say do we? I am not sure you could point to the SSDF list as validity in any form. First they didn't test Rybka and all other rating lists clearly show it as stronger than any other engines. But that said you certainly don't need evidence for a statement when it is clearly written as a personal opinion. >Based on the number of responses many people obviously found this interesting Apparently though after making the post you didn't find any other comments interesting as you didn't reply to any of those who replied to your original post. Not that it matters, but to me at least posting what is a personal opinion and then not replying to those who chose to reply just seems a little odd. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.