Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Very strong performance by Spike 1.1: Rang 6 in new PEJ-ratinglist.

Author: Per Jørgensen

Date: 09:38:07 02/12/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 12, 2006 at 12:23:00, Graham Banks wrote:

>On February 12, 2006 at 10:05:58, Per Jørgensen wrote:
>
>>Hello Chesscomputerfriends!
>>
>>As I wrote in this Forum February the 8th I'm making a new ratinglist. I am
>>still using fixed openingpositions in stead of the openingsbooks of each engine
>>(or a common book for all engines). Here are the 10 fixed openingpositions I am
>>using for my tests:
>>
>>1. Queens Gambit: 1.d4, d5 2.c4
>>2. Kings Gambit: 1.e4, e5 2. f4
>>3. Stonewall: 1.d4, e6 2.c4, f5 3.Sc3, d5 4.Sf3, c6
>>4. Caro Kann: 1.e4, c6 2.d4, d5
>>5. English: 1.c4, c5 2.Sc3, Sc6
>>6. Russian: 1.e4, e5 2. Sf3, Sf6
>>7. King- or Grünfeldindian: 1.d4, Sf6 2.c4, g6 3.Sc3
>>8. Sicilian: 1.e4, c5 2.Sf3, d6 3.d4, cxd4
>>9. Queens indian: 1.d4, Sf6 2.c4, e6 3. Sf3, b6 4. g3, Lb7 5. Lg2, Le7
>>10. French: 1.e4, e6 2.d4, d5
>>
>>Every engine has got to play each openingposition with both white and black
>>meaning that a match between 2 engines consists of 20 games. I find that the
>>chosen fixed openingpositions provide a fair mix of open, tactical and closed
>>positional openings. I would like to thank Klaus Wlotzka (running the
>>CSS-Ratinglist) for support and advices in the whole process.
>>
>>I'm running my tests on this Hardware:
>>
>>Asus A8V Motherboard, Socket 939, FSB 1.000 MHz
>>AMD Athlon 64 4000+, 2.4 GHz, 1 MB Level 2 Cache, 90 nm San Diego Core
>>2 x 512 MB Corsair PC 3200XLPT RAM (CAS Latency 2-2-2-5)
>>
>>And here are the specific testconditions:
>>
>>Windows XP Pro
>>Hiarcs 10 GUI
>>10 fixed openingpositions, all openingbooks for the engines are OFF
>>Thinkingtime for each engine: 6 min. for the whole game + 6 bonussec. pr. move
>>Hash Tables for each engine: 64 MB PC 3200 Ram (CAS Latency 2-2-2-5)
>>8 MB Cache for TB's
>>TB's: Nalimov - 3 und 4-pieces
>>Pondern OFF
>>
>>Lately I have been testing the new Spike 1.1 and here are the specific results:
>>
>>Spike 1.1 - Fruit 2.2.1 9-11 (!)
>>Spike 1.1 - Hiarcs 10 8½-11½
>>Spike 1.1 - Toga II 1.1a 9-11
>>Spike 1.1 - Shredder 9 11½-8½
>>Spike 1.1 - Fritz 9 11½-8½ (!)
>>Spike 1.1 - SmarThink 1.00 11-9
>>Spike 1.1 - Ktulu 7.5 11½-8½
>>Spike 1.1 - Loop List 600 13-7
>>Spike 1.1 - Naum 1.91 12-8
>>Spike 1.1 - Glaurung 1.0.1 11½-8½
>>Spike 1.1 - Ruffian 2.1.0 12½-7½
>>
>>Generally I find these results very impressing. A total score near 50% against
>>the 5 topengines is simply amazing. In the latest rating Spike 1.1 take up a
>>position as number 6 and not far away from Shredder 9 and Fritz 9:
>>
>><tt><pcode>
>>    Program                        Elo    +   -   Games   Score   Av.Op.  Draws
>>
>>  1 Fruit 2.2.1                  : 2746   39  39   220    62.3 %   2659   30.0 %
>>  2 Hiarcs 10                    : 2743   40  40   220    61.8 %   2659   26.4 %
>>  3 Toga II 1.1a                 : 2729   38  38   220    59.8 %   2660   33.2 %
>>  4 Shredder 9                   : 2713   39  39   220    57.3 %   2662   28.2 %
>>  5 Fritz 9                      : 2711   39  39   220    57.0 %   2662   29.5 %
>>  6 Spike 1.1                    : 2698   38  38   220    55.0 %   2663   30.9 %
>>  7 SmarThink 1.00               : 2656   38  38   220    48.4 %   2667   32.3 %
>>  8 Ktulu 7.5                    : 2639   40  40   220    45.7 %   2669   25.9 %
>>  9 Naum 1.91                    : 2602   38  38   220    40.0 %   2672   33.6 %
>> 10 Loop List 600                : 2600   41  41   220    39.8 %   2672   23.2 %
>> 11 Glaurung 1.0.1               : 2588   42  42   220    38.0 %   2673   20.5 %
>> 12 Ruffian 2.1.0                : 2568   39  39   220    35.0 %   2675   31.8 %
>> </pcode></tt>
>>
>>All engines are playing with their default-settings with exception of Hiarcs 10
>>which is being tested with Hypermodern ON.
>>
>>Congratulations for Schäfer and Böhm for making this excellent engine which at
>>that is a free-ware engine. Besides from Toga II 1.1a there is no doubt that
>>Spike 1.1 currently is the strongest free-ware engine.
>>
>>As soon as Rybka 1.2 is available I will naturally test this extraordinary
>>engine but in the meantime I'll make other tests for my ratinglist. Next engine
>>to be tested: Gandalf 6.
>>
>>Best regards
>>Per
>
>
>Hi Per,
>
>I enjoy following the progress of your rating list. Keep up the good work.
>Spike 1.1 has indeed done well and I add my thanks to Ralf and Volker for their
>efforts.
>
>Regards, Graham.

Hi Graham!

Thanks for your interest in my testwork. I will continue to publish publish new
results and ratnglists in the CCC-Forum and in the CSS-Forum (german) as well. I
just started the Gandalf 6.0 test and very soon I'll test Rybka 1.2 from which I
expect a lot.

Regards
Per



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.