Author: Ray Banks
Date: 14:20:31 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 15:23:50, Alessandro Scotti wrote: >Hi, >is there a table somewhere that shows how much Elo can an engine get from being >10%, 20%, ... 100+% faster? >Usually speed improvements are considered marginal to "algorithmic" >improvements, but on CEGT the difference between Deep Shredder 9.12 x64 2CPU and >Shredder 9 is 65 elo, and between Rybka 64-bit and Rybka 32-bit an amazing 62 >elo... in the latter case not bad at all for just recompiling the program! >I'd rather have my program slow and correct than fast and buggy, but I'm still >wondering if it's still worth to invest some effort in optimizing things a >little. http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/CCRL-4040/rating-table-all.shtml We currently have a difference of 42 ELO Rybka 64 bit vs 32 bit. Our time control is more than twice as long as CEGT though, and that could have an impact. Plus our volume of games is fairly low so the statistical error is somewhat higher unfortunately :-( We are also testing Naum in both 32 bit and 64 bit versions, so that will also give more information. But that will take 2-3 weeks probably
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.