Author: Albert Silver
Date: 14:28:31 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
>>>You are hardly "new" Sarah, and you know it.
>>>
>>>Which would you rather be called? Sherry Windsor? Sarah Reynolds?
>>>
>>>If your post isn't useless, please explain how it is.
>>>
>>>You make a blanket statement, provide no proof for your statement.. typical..
>>>
>>>Peter
>>
>> Now you are getting even more rediculous then I thought possible even for you.
>>The title of my post who "How strong is Hiarcs" this is a question not a
>>statement. Why should I not proof for a Question? Then in the content of the
>>post I said it "seems to me that rykba is very strong and is stronger then
>>rykba" this is a subjective feeling,
>
>You made the statement with the content of the post. Peter made no mention of
>the header.
>"This program to me seems stronger then Rykba, it plays a mean game of chess and
>doesn't give the human player any chances at all, great program i think."
Still, you must admit it is quite a turnaround from the initial "Hiarcs Sucks"
statement. ;-)
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.