Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 14:58:26 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
Pete, as someone who has experience with a crowd vs one person I want to advise you to let them write further objections without always replying to each and every point. The reason is simple. With the hours passing by you will neccessarily make little mistakes, certain slips of tongue and this will stir next emotional reactions. The situation however is the following: on basis of ยง 4 of the CCC charter you defined the other posting of Vas as advertising and you are absolutely correct. Now it is not your job to explain this verdict to every member who hasnt understood it yet. Let this be done by people who have a fresh start. Also concerning that the question is so trivial. Ok, such a message here is a bit special but then I have concrete observations for my say. I know that you think that if you give it a rest that you could appear as if your arguments were running out, or you want just to be nice to everybody. But this is only a very superficial view. And you cant improve a verdict that is absolutely true by further explanations or elaborations. You must also realise that language is a universe for misunderstandings. And you simply cant convince more than 99% of 100%. Just to give unrealistic numbers... Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.