Author: M Hurd
Date: 15:04:48 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2006 at 13:32:33, Peter Skinner wrote: >This is nothing more than a flagrant attempt in polling users about possible >commercial payment possibilities for your program, and as such I am removing the >thread. > >As per the charter: > >Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and >post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response >messages: > > 1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess > 2. Are not abusive in nature > 3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others > 4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations > 5. Are not of questionable legal status. > >What about rule #4 do you not understand? > >Peter Hello Peter Why did you not just simply have removed the entire thread including (Vasiks original post) and sent him an e-mail explaining why, perhaps with a post here as per your above but without the unnecessary sarcastic remark [What about rule #4 do you not understand?] Although you might be fed up with the number of rybka posts here, an emotional outburst coming from a moderator does not seem the most proffesional way to conduct ones self. It sends the wrong message to the rest of the members. Regards Mike
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.